»Informed Consent Process

Informed consent is the process of telling potential research participants about the key elements of a research study and what’s involved so the person can decide if they want to participate. This process is one of the central components of the ethical conduct of research with human subjects. 

The consent process typically includes providing a written consent document containing the required information (i.e., the elements of informed consent under the 2018 Common Rule) and the presentation of that information to prospective participants. 

In most cases, investigators are expected to obtain a signature from the participant on a written informed consent document (i.e., to document a person’s consent to participate) unless the IRB has waived the requirement to consent or the requirement to document consent (e.g., signature). (See the IRB’s guidelines on Informed Consent /research/integrity/irb/policies.aspx) 

Even in situations where the IRB may waive the documentation (signature) requirement (e.g., for a telephone interview or online survey), investigators must present participants with the required key elements of informed consent and with a copy of the written consent document (or a link to download/print the consent form). 

General Information and Tips for Preparing a Consent Document 

Reading Level 

Informed consent documents should be written in plain language at a level appropriate to the participants, typically at an 8th grade level.  A best practice is to have a colleague or friend read the informed consent document for comprehension before submitting the IRB application.  Always: 

  • Tailor the document to the participants 
  • Avoid technical jargon or overly complex terms. 
  • Use straightforward, understandable language. 

Writing Tips 

The informed consent document should succinctly describe the research as it has been presented in the IRB application. 

  • Use the second person (you) or third person (he/she/they) to present the study details. Avoid the use of the first person (I).   
  • Include a statement of agreement at the conclusion of the informed consent document.  
  • Be consistent with the information that is described in the IRB application. 

Although the requirements set forth in the Common Rule provide the elements of informed consent, the research team must determine the most pertinent information about the study to provide, the most effective way to communicate that information, and the most accurate way to assess if the research participant understood the information. Additional information must be included in informed consent documents for clinical trials. 

The IRB may make recommendations or edits to consent forms to ensure all identified risks are clearly stated. The IRB may also provide ideas of what a reasonable person would want to know and what might be the most helpful information for the person’s decision about whether or not to participate. Of course, the IRB must also help ensure all of the required elements are included per the federal regulations. Please see the “Forms” section for the IRB’s templates related to the consenting process. 

Debriefing 

Under certain conditions (§46.116(d)), the IRB may approve a research study that involves deception or incomplete disclosure. In this case, participants must be “debriefed” or provided additional information about the study once it ends. The debriefing process should provide participants with an explanation of the study’s purpose, the procedures in which deception occurred, and why it was necessary for deception to occur.  Participants must also choose whether or not the researchers may use their data collected prior to debriefing. Please see the “Forms” section for the IRB’s template on debriefing participants.  

Translation Certification 

Non-English speakers must be presented study information in the language that they can understand well so that they are able to make an informed decision as to whether to join or remain on a study. If there are non-English participants, research teams must ensure that non-English language resources (e.g., translated questionnaires, there are research team members/service providers who can answer non-English participants’ questions, etc.) are in place throughout the study and not only during recruitment and consenting. Please see the “Forms” section for the IRB’s Certification Guidance and Form.


Toggle Section

Screening, Recruiting, or Determining Eligibility

Per 45 CFR 46.116(g) of the 2018 Requirements, informed consent is not required for an investigator to obtain information or biospecimens for the purpose of screening, recruiting, or determining the eligibility of prospective subjects if either of the following conditions are met:

 

(i) The investigator will obtain information through oral or written communication with the prospective subject or legally authorized representative, or

(ii) The investigator will obtain identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens by accessing records or stored identifiable biospecimens.

 

If either of the 2 conditions above are met, the IRB may approve the study without need for the research team to request a waiver of consent.

Basic Elements of Informed Consent

These elements are mandatory in all protocols that receive expedited or full board review unless the IRB determines the study as exempt:

  1. A statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject's participation, a description of the procedures to be followed, and identification of any procedures that are experimental
  2. A description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject.
  3. A description of any benefits to the subject or to others that may reasonably be expected from the research
  4. A disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any, that might be advantageous to the subject
  5. A statement describing the extent, if any, to which confidentiality of records identifying the subject will be maintained
  6. For research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to whether any compensation and an explanation as to whether any medical treatments are available if injury occurs and, if so, what they consist of, or where further information may be obtained
    1. The FDA and HHS regulations state, “Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfortanticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests”
  7. An explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions about the research and research subjects' rights, and whom to contact in the event of a research-related injury to the subject
  8. A statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled

Waiving or Altering Elements of Consent

There are times when the study requires that at least one of the  required elements of consent 46.116(b) or 46.116(c)  be waived or altered. An example is the use ofdeception where the consent document does not disclose the full purpose of the research or fully describes all of the study procedures. 

For the IRB to approve the PI’s request to waive or alter elements of consent, the following 5 criteria (same as those for waiving the entire consenting process) must be met: 

(i) The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects;  

(ii) The research could not possibly be carried out without the requested waiver or alteration;  

(iii) If the research involves using identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, the research could not be possibly carried out without using such information or biospecimens in an identifiable format;  

(iv) The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects; and  

(v) Whenever appropriate, the subjects or legally authorized representatives will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation. 

The same criteria apply for FDA-regulated studies. 

Waiving the Entire Consent Process

There are some studies (including those that are FDA-regulated) for which the IRB may waive the entire consenting process if the following 5 criteria are met:

(i) The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects;

(ii) The research could not possibly be carried out without the requested waiver or alteration;

(iii) If the research involves using identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, the research could not be possibly carried out without using such information or biospecimens in an identifiable format;

(iv) The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects; and

(v) Whenever appropriate, the subjects or legally authorized representatives will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation.

For FDA-regulated studies which involve life-threatening situations, military operations, public health emergencies, the study must also meet criteria described in 21 CFR 50.23.

For FDA-regulated studies which involve emergency research (e.g., hemorrhagic stroke), the criteria per 21 CFR 50.24 must be met for an IRB to waive the consenting process.

Waiving Documentation of Consent

Per 45 CFR 46.117, documentation of informed consent may be either of the following: 

  • The subject or subject’s Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) has signed the informed consent form that meets the requirements of § 46.116. 
  • A short form written informed consent form stating that the elements of informed consent required by § 46.116 have been presented orally to the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, and that the key information required by § 46. 116(a)(5)(i) was presented first to the subject, before other information, if any, was provided. The IRB shall approve a written summary of what is to be said to the subject or the legally authorized representative. When this method is used, there shall be a witness to the oral presentation. Only the short form itself is to be signed by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative. However, the witness shall sign both the short form and a copy of the summary, and the person actually obtaining consent shall sign a copy of the summary. A copy of the summary shall be given to the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, in addition to a copy of the short form. 

 

For FDA-regulated research (FDA’s Informed Consent Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors (August 2023), obtaining consent without any documentation at all (e.g., solely via telephone) is not acceptable. At the very least,  “[i]n situations in which the signed document cannot be retrieved . . . and electronic consent is not available, it is acceptable to retain for the study records a photographic image of the signed consent form along with an attestation by the person entering the photograph into the study records that states how the photograph was obtained and that it is a photograph of the informed consent form signed by the subject.” 

 

 

An IRB may waive the requirement for the investigator to obtain a signed informed consent form for some or all subjects if it finds any of the following:

(i) That the only record linking the subject and the research would be the informed consent form and the principal risk would be potential harm resulting from a breach of confidentiality. Each subject (or legally authorized representative) will be asked whether the subject wants documentation linking the subject with the research, and the subject's wishes will govern;

(ii) That the research presents no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside of the research context; or

(iii) If the subjects or legally authorized representatives are members of a distinct cultural group or community in which signing forms is not the norm, that the research presents no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and provided there is an appropriate alternative mechanism for documenting that informed consent was obtained.

California Experimental Subject’s Bill of Rights

California Experimental Subject’s Bill of Rights

The California Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act (Section 24170-24179.5) requires all medical experimentation to be “undertaken with due respect for human life and the right of individuals to determine what is done to their own bodies”. All participants in medical experiments must be provided a written “Experimental Subject's Bill of Rights” in addition to informed consent.

 

A medical experiment is defined under section 24174 of the California Health and Safety Code as follows:

  • The severance or penetration or damaging of tissues of a human subject or the use of a drug or device, as defined in Section 109920 or 109925, electromagnetic radiation, heat or cold, or a biological substance or organism, in or upon a human subject in the practice or research of medicine in a manner not reasonably related to maintaining or improving the health of the subject or otherwise directly benefiting the subject;
  • The investigational use of a drug or device as provided in Sections 111590 and 111595;
  • Withholding medical treatment from a human subject for any purpose other than maintenance or improvement of the health of the subject.

As defined in Section 109925

  1. “Drug” means any of the following:
    1. An article recognized in an official compendium.
    2. An article used or intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in human beings or any other animal.
    3. An article other than food, that is used or intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of human beings or any other animal.
    4. An article used or intended for use as a component of an article designated in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.
  2. The term “drug” does not include any device.
  3. Any food for which a claim (as described in Sections 403(r)(1)(B) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 343(r)(1)(B)) and 403(r)(3) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 343(r)(3)) or Sections 403(r)(1)(B) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 343(r)(1)(B)) and 403(r)(5)(D) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 343(r)(5)(D)) of the federal act), is made in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 403(r) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 343(r)) of the federal act, is not a drug under subdivision (b) solely because the label or labeling contains such a claim.
  4. Cannabis product, including any cannabis product intended for external use, is not a drug.

 

As defined in Section 109920, a device means any instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory, that is any of the following:

  1. Recognized in the official National Formulary or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them.
  2. Intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other condition, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in humans or any other animal.
  3. Intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of humans or any other animal and that does not achieve any of its principal intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of humans or other animals and that is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its principal intended purposes.

 

The Cayuse IRB Application will prompt researchers if certain study procedures meet the requirement for the Experimental Subject’s Bill of Rights form. If any of the following categories apply, please note them in the submission, and ensure the Form is provided to participants.

  • Use of a device (e.g., electromyography [EMG], electroencephalography [EEG], inertial sensor, motion capture systems, smartphone apps, electrical stimulation systems, sphygmomanometers and other physiological monitoring devices, and in-vitro testing kits or reagents)
  • Use of ingestible substances other than drugs or food
  • Invasive medical procedures (e.g., severance, penetration, or damaging of human tissue)
  • Withholding medical treatment
  • Applying hot or cold to participants
  • Electromagnetic radiation
  • Other medical experiments as defined under the California Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act

 

California law requires that the Experimental Subject’s Bill of Rights should remain a separate document from the informed consent form. It must be attached to the front of the informed consent form. In addition, the copy is to be dated and signed by the research participant or the participant’s legally authorized representative. The participant or the participant’s legally authorized representative is given a copy of the Experimental Subject’s Bill of Rights before giving consent to participate in any medical experiment.

The California Experimental Subject’s Bill of Rights must be provided to the participant or the participant’s legally authorized representative in his or her language during the consent process. This also applies when a Short Form is used in the consent process. If you have any questions regarding the use of the form, please contact the IRB Office for additional information.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

A GDPR Notice and Consent (available in the Forms under the subheader “Consent forms and related documents”) must be used for studies that include collecting data from participants located in a country that belongs to the European Union (EU) or in the European Economic Area (EEA). Additional data security provisions will apply to these studies, and special approval is required.  

Contact the IRB at irb@chapman.edu for more information.